Re^2: Perl's __LINE_

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Perl's __LINE__ off by 2 by LanX (Saint) on Aug 26, 2025 at 10:20 UTC
indeed, but I would use both options to be sure about differing interpretations of CR LF `4 5 6 $VAR1 = [ "use v5.12; \n", "use warnings;\n", "use Data::Dumper;\n", "say __LINE__;\n", "say __LINE__;\n", "say __LINE__;\n", "\n", "\n", "seek DATA,0,0;\n", "my \@lines = <DATA>;\n", "\$Data::Dumper::Useqq=1;\n", "say Dumper \\\@lines;\n", "\n", "__DATA__\n" ];` [download] Additionally one could run the file in the debugger and use the command 'v' or inspect @DB::dbline Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) see Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Perl's __LINE__ off by 2 by ysth (Canon) on Aug 26, 2025 at 16:22 UTC
Not sure what you mean? Dumper doesn't AFAIK have interpretations of CR LF, it is just showing the data, either outputting it raw (for the CRLF-relevant characters) or as escapes with Useqq, where \r means chr(0x13) and \n means chr(0x10) (assuming non-EBCDIC). If perl is opening the source in text mode, a `binmode DATA;` before the seek/read may be good (don't know if that even works or if DATA is somehow magic in a way that prevents changing layers).	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: Perl's __LINE__ off by 2 by LanX (Saint) on Aug 26, 2025 at 16:43 UTC
> Not sure what you mean? see Re: Perl's __LINE__ off by 2 The OP thinks that he has a mix of newlines in his source, leading to different line interpretations by Perl and his editor. I'm pretty sure that <DATA> gives me the lines the same way the compiler sees them. A dump OTOH might add another layer of confusion. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) see Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply]