in reply to Re^6: How do I go from PROCEDURAL to object oriented programming?
in thread How do I go from procedural to object oriented programming?

Perhaps YOUR future runs on old technology, but my future is so bright that I gotta wear shades.

Your attitude works well against Perl, by the way. In case you didn't notice those antiquated (and most likely monolithic) CGI scripts are being replaced around the globe with technologies based on Java, Python, Ruby and C#. What you suggest would further cause Perl to lose market share.

How you like them constraints?

  • Comment on Re^7: How do I go from PROCEDURAL to object oriented programming?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^8: How do I go from PROCEDURAL to object oriented programming?
by Anonymous Monk on Apr 22, 2015 at 23:19 UTC

    Perhaps YOUR ...Your attitude ...How you like them constraints?

    So you're going to donate lady_Alena new hosting so she can enjoy newer than perl 5.8.8 and moose and Dancer and whatever else she wants? You're going to do that?

      Seems to me that she could have hosted all of this in a blog. What is your problem by the way? Are you allergic to good advice and best practices?

        Seems to me that she could have hosted all of this in a blog.

        Well, she isn't , so her constraints are her constraints, no sense in pretending they don't exist

        What is your problem by the way? Are you allergic to good advice and best practices?

        "good advice and best practices" that ignores the constraints is bad advice -- repeatedly saying "just upgrade" is very rude

A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.