in reply to Re^7: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section?
in thread [OT] How about an Off Topic Section?

'I currently have 5 separate editor sessions running: 2 are mostly Perl files; with bits of C and C++ thrown in. 1 has mostly Javascript files; some html files; some css files. 1 is mostly C & C++ files with a smattering of makefiles and the like. 1 contains: 1 Dart file; 2 Go files; 2 Javascript files; and a Haskell file.'

But you don't have a Github account?
  • Comment on Re^8: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^9: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section?
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jun 09, 2015 at 00:04 UTC
    But you don't have a Github account?

    What would I want with one of those? What would I do with it?

    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I'm with torvalds on this
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked
[reply]
      Thank you for just making a total hypocrite out of yourself.
[reply]

        How's that? (Or was that the first non-sequitous thing that popped into your poor overloaded head.)

        With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
        Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
        "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I'm with torvalds on this
        In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked
[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion