in reply to Re^17: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section?
in thread [OT] How about an Off Topic Section?

If people can't even discuss change -- you think they'll somehow magically be able to work on the change? '

How many times do we need to state that this request has been requested so many times that it was turned in an official document? People can discuss change all they want. They can also throw temper tantrums like BrowserUk has done when they don't get want they want.
  • Comment on Re^18: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^19: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section?
by Anonymous Monk on Jun 09, 2015 at 02:27 UTC

    If people can't even discuss change -- you think they'll somehow magically be able to work on the change? '

    What would you know about discussion? Either way the change is trivial to implement -- any programmer would know that

    How many times do we need to state that this request has been requested so many times that it was turned in an official document? People can discuss change all they want.

    We? Who are you that anyone should pay attention to your saying the same thing over and over and over again?

    Can they now? As long as they're subjected to constant abuse ? Thats the precondition right?

    Dumb

        'Either way the change is trivial to implement'

        Which goes to show that the change is not wanted. Being told "no" is not abuse, you are just a spoiled brat who throws a tantrum when you don't get what you want.

        Read it again: I think there should be a new Section on PerlMonks for Jobs/Modules/Quizzes/Perl6/Newbies/OffTopic/etc.

        Oh its me throwing a tantrum? You're funny