Re^19: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section?

If people can't even discuss change -- you think they'll somehow magically be able to work on the change? '

What would you know about discussion? Either way the change is trivial to implement -- any programmer would know that

How many times do we need to state that this request has been requested so many times that it was turned in an official document? People can discuss change all they want.

We? Who are you that anyone should pay attention to your saying the same thing over and over and over again?

Can they now? As long as they're subjected to constant abuse ? Thats the precondition right?

Dumb

Comment on Re^19: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^20: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section? by Anonymous Monk on Jun 09, 2015 at 23:54 UTC
'Either way the change is trivial to implement' Which goes to show that the change is not wanted. Being told "no" is not abuse, you are just a spoiled brat who throws a tantrum when you don't get what you want. Read it again: I think there should be a new Section on PerlMonks for Jobs/Modules/Quizzes/Perl6/Newbies/OffTopic/etc.	[reply]
Re^21: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section? by Anonymous Monk on Jun 10, 2015 at 02:49 UTC
'Either way the change is trivial to implement' Which goes to show that the change is not wanted. Being told "no" is not abuse, you are just a spoiled brat who throws a tantrum when you don't get what you want. Read it again: I think there should be a new Section on PerlMonks for Jobs/Modules/Quizzes/Perl6/Newbies/OffTopic/etc. Oh its me throwing a tantrum? You're funny	[reply]
Re^22: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section? by Anonymous Monk on Jun 10, 2015 at 03:47 UTC
If you were the one who actually just cried "abuse." Then yes. I didn't get my OT section -- I am being ABUSED!	[reply]