Re^9: Experimental features: autoderef vs postfix deref

... Surely you mean ... If you don't mean that... I don't know why postderef upsets you so much. It's just like, you know, the rest of that syntax.

You don't even know whats being discussed? Oh boy

Comment on Re^9: Experimental features: autoderef vs postfix deref

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^10: Experimental features: autoderef vs postfix deref by Anonymous Monk on Jul 14, 2015 at 01:35 UTC
Oh boy, I should've guessed that someone will surely miss the point. Stare at this until you understand: `$foo->{bar}->{baz}; $foo->{bar}->{barz}->@*; ${${$foo}{bar}}{baz}; @{${${$foo}{bar}}{baz}};` [download]	[reply] [d/l]
Re^11: Experimental features: autoderef vs postfix deref by Anonymous Monk on Jul 14, 2015 at 01:52 UTC
`@{${${$foo}{bar}}{baz}};` Is a bullshit way of writing `@{ $foo->{bar}{baz} }` Which is a darn sight nicer than this monstrosity `$foo->{bar}->{barz}->@*;`	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^12: Experimental features: autoderef vs postfix deref by Anonymous Monk on Jul 14, 2015 at 01:59 UTC
Likewise, `${ $foo->{bar} }{baz}` is also a darn sight nicer then the monstrosity `$foo->{bar}->{baz}`? If not, why?	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^13: Experimental features: autoderef vs postfix deref by Anonymous Monk on Jul 14, 2015 at 02:05 UTC
Re^14: Experimental features: autoderef vs postfix deref by Anonymous Monk on Jul 14, 2015 at 02:18 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here