Re^10: Experimental features: autoderef vs postfix deref

Oh boy, I should've guessed that someone will surely miss the point. Stare at this until you understand:

$foo->{bar}->{baz};
$foo->{bar}->{barz}->@*;

${${$foo}{bar}}{baz};
@{${${$foo}{bar}}{baz}};
[download]

Comment on Re^10: Experimental features: autoderef vs postfix deref Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^11: Experimental features: autoderef vs postfix deref by Anonymous Monk on Jul 14, 2015 at 01:52 UTC
`@{${${$foo}{bar}}{baz}};` Is a bullshit way of writing `@{ $foo->{bar}{baz} }` Which is a darn sight nicer than this monstrosity `$foo->{bar}->{barz}->@*;`	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^12: Experimental features: autoderef vs postfix deref by Anonymous Monk on Jul 14, 2015 at 01:59 UTC
Likewise, `${ $foo->{bar} }{baz}` is also a darn sight nicer then the monstrosity `$foo->{bar}->{baz}`? If not, why?	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^13: Experimental features: autoderef vs postfix deref by Anonymous Monk on Jul 14, 2015 at 02:05 UTC
Because its not the top level entity. `push array, value;` template `push @{ ... }, 4;` Clear example; `push $foo->{bar}->{baz}->%*, 4;` ## WTF is that?	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^14: Experimental features: autoderef vs postfix deref by Anonymous Monk on Jul 14, 2015 at 02:18 UTC
Re^15: Experimental features: autoderef vs postfix deref by Anonymous Monk on Jul 14, 2015 at 02:33 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here