in reply to Re^3: Just curious: is there a BOT that downvotes "me?"
in thread Just curious: is there a BOT that downvotes "me?"

As I've said before, I downvote all thought-police posts and suggestions. I downvote often when these sort of discussions come up. :|

  • Comment on Re^4: Just curious: is there a BOT that downvotes "me?"

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Just curious: is there a BOT that downvotes "me?"
by chacham (Prior) on Jul 17, 2015 at 13:15 UTC

    Who said anything about thought-police? This could be a way to optionally provide backup for one's own claim. That is, a monk who already stated he does not downvote, can even back up that claim, optionally, and temporarily.

      If it's optional to display, that is certainly better. I tend to downvote monks who persistently ask for new features without ever volunteering to write the code too. Heck, I guess I just like downvoting. :P

        Yeah, the thought was for "an optional field".

        I tend to downvote monks who persistently ask for new features without ever volunteering to write the code too.

        I'm not good enough to write perl for this site. I'd easily volunteer to help with SQL, though.

        If it's optional to display, that is certainly better. I tend to downvote monks who persistently ask for new features without ever volunteering to write the code too. Heck, I guess I just like downvoting. :P

        Are you talking about "i need this feature" type requests, or "I think this feature has merit" type requests?

        How do you know how much code is required? (a lot of the requested features already have code written for them)