I take your apologies, that is ok :)
You say that swat is wrapper around prove and that is true. But what wrong with that? Swat uses prove to run tests. But this only one small "part" of swat , the main "part" of swat is DSL to allow one creates smoke tests for web application in quite fast and simple way. This DSL does not relate to prove at all . Please read my docs to see what this DSL is. And then let's compare with other modules , it would be interesting.
Does it make a sense ? | [reply] |
| [reply] |
I of course could not realize your reality , but I use swat for a dozens web applications daily. I mean I write a new tests daily because I need this and I have time shortage, this is not artificial but real life context. This is how swat appeared . Swat by design is specially for smoke tests , no user acceptance, no UI, no Java script , no Ajax , etc, I quite ok with that there are speal tools for that ( and you know I have an experience with this too. ) But look, I talk about smoke tests , my context is quite simple - give this host a curl , check some http uri-s and that is it.
So the quality is over quantity , I agree. With swat I get qualitive smoke tests with low time price . Sure. This is proven by my experience. So why do not you try?
| [reply] |