in reply to Time for an application portfolio

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Time for an application portfolio
by talexb (Chancellor) on Jul 29, 2015 at 14:24 UTC

    There are a couple of advantages in putting my portfolio onto a website:

    • Anyone can look at the application, at any time. That's better than sitting through a video (although the video is something I might do).
    • The visitor can interact with the application, and may even find it useful.
    • I'll gain the experience of how to get it running on a shared web host (I'm working on this now, and so far, it's not trivial).
    • I plan to link from each application to the associated repo on github, so people can look at the code I've written. Code craftmanship is a big deal to me.

    Alex / talexb / Toronto

    Thanks PJ. We owe you so much. Groklaw -- RIP -- 2003 to 2013.

      Your reasons and approach are right on. You will get hired this way and be a better dev for the process. As you have found, deployment is often harder than development and begins to impose a healthy parsimony on both.

      I'll gain the experience of how to get it running on a shared web host (I'm working on this now, and so far, it's not trivial).
      Do let us know how you get on - I also have shared hosting on Pair but was under the impression that you could not run persistent processes.

        I'll write more in a later post, but for now, it's just running as a regular CGI. :( This is probably the worst way to take advantage of Mojo; I'd love to run a long-running daemon instead, but that approach is almost certainly out of the question. :)

        Alex / talexb / Toronto

        Thanks PJ. We owe you so much. Groklaw -- RIP -- 2003 to 2013.

      Well, if you ever need a demo video of your Paradox database utility made in RealVideo format and pushed across the PointCast network to its subscribers, you now know the man for the job.