in reply to Re^4: Perl - Unique Numbers
in thread Perl - Unique Numbers
No, his code prints 10 numbers. Where do you see that he saves anything?
His loop handling is definitely non-Perl. He could just have done:For such a trivial problem, if he had one previous response, I wouldn't have commented at all. When I posted, I was the 3rd comment, so I added the 'another way of doing' phrase.for ( 1..10 )
Regards...Ed
"Well done is better than well said." - Benjamin Franklin
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^6: Perl - Unique Numbers
by johngg (Canon) on Oct 18, 2015 at 22:46 UTC | |
Re^6: Perl - Unique Numbers
by dsheroh (Monsignor) on Oct 19, 2015 at 12:06 UTC |