Re^3: List::MoreUtils' minmax bug?

The code in Re: List::MoreUtils' minmax bug? is not displaying the bug that the OP displays, but the node also clearly says so. What are you complaining about?

Comment on Re^3: List::MoreUtils' minmax bug?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: List::MoreUtils' minmax bug? by Anonymous Monk on Mar 16, 2016 at 18:54 UTC
I'm asking where the bug is (in Re: List::MoreUtils' minmax bug?). The `minmax()` is fed with `undef` in its input, same `undef` appears in output. GIGO.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: List::MoreUtils' minmax bug? by Anonymous Monk on Mar 16, 2016 at 18:58 UTC
Sure, and if you understand the "I smell a bug" to be referring to the OP, then Re: List::MoreUtils' minmax bug? never claims that there is a bug in its code :-) It just reproduces an output "kinda sorta" like in the OP, except that it is `(undef, 0.002)` instead of the OP's `(0.002, undef)`	[reply] [d/l] [select]