Re^4: List::MoreUtils' minmax bug?

I'm asking where the bug is (in Re: List::MoreUtils' minmax bug?). The minmax() is fed with undef in its input, same undef appears in output. GIGO.

Comment on Re^4: List::MoreUtils' minmax bug? Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: List::MoreUtils' minmax bug? by Anonymous Monk on Mar 16, 2016 at 18:58 UTC
Sure, and if you understand the "I smell a bug" to be referring to the OP, then Re: List::MoreUtils' minmax bug? never claims that there is a bug in its code :-) It just reproduces an output "kinda sorta" like in the OP, except that it is `(undef, 0.002)` instead of the OP's `(0.002, undef)`	[reply] [d/l] [select]