I should have said "will not be noticeable in practice." In fact, I will say it...
Agreed. But...
Since there is no practical, clarity, nor conciseness advantage for this operation; why would you choose to use the less efficient over the more?
Better methinks to get into the habit of thinking: 1 for 1 replacement of single chars, use tr///; than to have to always make a decision (or even investigate at what point) you should shift tack for this maneuverer.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
| [reply] |
Agreed. But... um... Well, I can't really come up with any pertinent exception or counterargument here. I just wanted to make the point to davies that in the context of the OPed question, there wasn't much difference.
Give a man a fish: <%-{-{-{-<
| [reply]
[d/l] |