Re^2: Why aren't you using Google::API::Client?

How did you find out it is not popular? Did Google Discovery tell you through their services?

Naw, I inferred it from the fact that the author's repo has a couple unreleased bug fixes from May of '15.

I rediscovered one of the bugs over the weekend, so I was encouraging the author to make a new release, and I thought I'd post here to see if we can generate some more interest.

Hope he's not going to abandon it because it's really nice to have the same interface across multiple G services.

Comment on Re^2: Why aren't you using Google::API::Client?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Why aren't you using Google::API::Client? by SankoR (Prior) on Oct 25, 2016 at 12:50 UTC
Naw, I inferred it from the fact that the author's repo has a couple unreleased bug fixes from May of '15. I've yet to find a need to use Google at an API level beyond their OAuth mess but unincorporated fixes just means Google::API::Client isn't popular with the author.	[reply]
Re^4: Why aren't you using Google::API::Client? by mla12 (Acolyte) on Oct 25, 2016 at 17:16 UTC
...unincorporated fixes just means Google::API::Client isn't popular with the author. My hope was simply to raise the profile of this great tool. I believe it isn't popular, based on my what I've seen. Perhaps my methodology there is flawed. I really don't care. My goal was not to prove that it's unpopular.	[reply]