Re^3: Why aren't you using Google::API::Client?

in reply to Re^2: Why aren't you using Google::API::Client?
in thread Why aren't you using Google::API::Client?

Naw, I inferred it from the fact that the author's repo has a couple unreleased bug fixes from May of '15.

I've yet to find a need to use Google at an API level beyond their OAuth mess but unincorporated fixes just means Google::API::Client isn't popular with the author.

Comment on Re^3: Why aren't you using Google::API::Client?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Why aren't you using Google::API::Client? by mla12 (Acolyte) on Oct 25, 2016 at 17:16 UTC
...unincorporated fixes just means Google::API::Client isn't popular with the author. My hope was simply to raise the profile of this great tool. I believe it isn't popular, based on my what I've seen. Perhaps my methodology there is flawed. I really don't care. My goal was not to prove that it's unpopular.	[reply]

In Section Meditations