Re^4: Editing node titles w.r.t. Perl 6

Let's think it trough ...

If you start an official policy - instead of a convention - to use [Perl6] so why not [vim] or [tk] or [*nix] or [LDAP] ... and so on?

And is [BioInf] already specific enough or should it be sub-classified into [FASTA] and [Homework] ?

On a side note ... the monastery has already a keyword nodelet nobody is using.

I'm in favour of tagging, just the implementation of an efficient rule seems unclear.

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)

Je suis Charlie!}

Comment on Re^4: Editing node titles w.r.t. Perl 6 Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Editing node titles w.r.t. Perl 6 by talexb (Chancellor) on Nov 24, 2016 at 16:00 UTC
If you start an official policy .. Chortle Official policy? Oh dear, I'm really not in charge of anything here. :) Except my own thoughts and opinions. However, your suggestion of `[$topic]` sounds excellent, and is probably one that has been used across forums (fora?) and mailing lists for decades. Since this is by default a `[Perl]` forum, then that tag is redundant. I think it's useful to highlight that a post might be somewhat off-topic by using a tag. Alex / talexb / Toronto Thanks PJ. We owe you so much. Groklaw -- RIP -- 2003 to 2013.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^6: Editing node titles w.r.t. Perl 6 by LanX (Saint) on Nov 24, 2016 at 16:09 UTC
We already have this convention and I'm following it. But infrequent users or newbies won't. And flooding the monastery with considerations to change the title according to a tagging standard wouldn't help either. So (sorry) what can be the outcome of this discussion? The only practical possibility I see is to upgrade the Keyword Nodelet ... but I don't see who's going implement this. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :) Je suis Charlie!}	[reply]