Re^4: UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives (Choose Mojolicious)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives (Choose Mojolicious) by trippledubs (Deacon) on Feb 28, 2017 at 04:08 UTC
Really. So are you making a recommendation or just throwing out links? Last time I used PHP we used it as a routing controller and for templating, same as mojo except suckier. Makes me feel like I'm <?php echo "writing html still" ?>	[reply]
Re^6: UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives (Choose Mojolicious) by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Feb 28, 2017 at 04:27 UTC
Personally I think Mason is problematic. It encourages a PHPish approach which is a total violation of separation of concerns—MVC. Not saying it cannot be used well, just that it takes a disciplined hacker to do so. I only mentioned it because it is the most like PHP. Embperl was the bee’s knees 20 years ago. It’s not something I’d recommend at all today.	[reply]
Re^6: UP-TO-DATE Comparison of CGI Alternatives (Choose Mojolicious) by Anonymous Monk on Feb 28, 2017 at 07:48 UTC
Last time I used PHP we used it as a routing controller and for templating, same as mojo except suckier. :) basically what you call "php" and what the rest of the world calls "php" aren't the same thing	[reply]