in reply to Re^5: Capture::Tiny alternative
in thread Capture::Tiny alternative
As evidenced by the sshuttle ... | cat test, the problem is indeed unrelated to perl. The sshuttle is a python program. Why have you chosen to raise the github issue with Capture-Tiny instead of sshuttle?
I've already hinted on three possible workarounds you could use on the perl size, that may or may not work at all. (Ignore SIGTTIN SIGTTOU before exec; Explicit redirect/close(STDERR); Setting up the task as session leader via IO::Pty.) Did you try any of these?
It is unlikely anyone on PerlMonks is going to debug python programs for your benefit or amusement. And we cannot Chuck Norris(*) your code.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^7: Capture::Tiny alternative
by melezhik (Monk) on Mar 26, 2017 at 16:39 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 26, 2017 at 17:01 UTC | |
by melezhik (Monk) on Mar 26, 2017 at 18:02 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 26, 2017 at 19:50 UTC | |
by melezhik (Monk) on Mar 26, 2017 at 20:05 UTC | |
by melezhik (Monk) on Mar 27, 2017 at 11:31 UTC |