Re^2: Safe module and undefined subroutines

Just to make a minor note here. In case of someone reports a new bug I do not know how fast it can be addressed?

The last updated date on github/Safe-Hole was 7-8 years ago. Not that this should stop you of reporting a possible bug but I do not know how fast it can be resolved.

Hope this helps, BR.

Seeking for Perl wisdom...on the process of learning...not there...yet!

Comment on Re^2: Safe module and undefined subroutines Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Safe module and undefined subroutines by syphilis (Archbishop) on Aug 25, 2017 at 10:10 UTC
The last updated date on github/Safe-Hole was 7-8 years ago The current maintainer of Safe::Hole (Todd Rinaldo) has, this year, updated a couple of other modules that he maintains. I would therefore expect that he would respond to any Safe::Hole bug report that was submitted. (No guarantees, of course.) Cheers, Rob	[reply]
Re^4: Safe module and undefined subroutines by stevieb (Canon) on Aug 25, 2017 at 21:53 UTC
++. If a CPAN user has been active on other distributions they are maintainer of, my experience has been for the most part that it'll at least be looked at. It may not be worked on right away, but at least you know they're doing work. If a response isn't received in a reasonably timely fashion, it doesn't hurt to ping the author via their point of contact (email, usually) as a polite request. People get busy, and sometimes see the bug email come in, but shuffle it away and then forget about it until the submitter or someone else who's hit the bug reaches out. It happens... I know ;)	[reply]