Re^3: Safe module and undefined subroutines

The last updated date on github/Safe-Hole was 7-8 years ago

The current maintainer of Safe::Hole (Todd Rinaldo) has, this year, updated a couple of other modules that he maintains.
I would therefore expect that he would respond to any Safe::Hole bug report that was submitted. (No guarantees, of course.)

Cheers,
Rob

Comment on Re^3: Safe module and undefined subroutines

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Safe module and undefined subroutines by stevieb (Canon) on Aug 25, 2017 at 21:53 UTC
++. If a CPAN user has been active on other distributions they are maintainer of, my experience has been for the most part that it'll at least be looked at. It may not be worked on right away, but at least you know they're doing work. If a response isn't received in a reasonably timely fashion, it doesn't hurt to ping the author via their point of contact (email, usually) as a polite request. People get busy, and sometimes see the bug email come in, but shuffle it away and then forget about it until the submitter or someone else who's hit the bug reaches out. It happens... I know ;)	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^4: Safe module and undefined subroutines
by stevieb (Canon) on Aug 25, 2017 at 21:53 UTC

++.

If a CPAN user has been active on other distributions they are maintainer of, my experience has been for the most part that it'll at least be looked at. It may not be worked on right away, but at least you know they're doing work. If a response isn't received in a reasonably timely fashion, it doesn't hurt to ping the author via their point of contact (email, usually) as a polite request.

People get busy, and sometimes see the bug email come in, but shuffle it away and then forget about it until the submitter or someone else who's hit the bug reaches out. It happens... I know ;)

[reply]