in reply to Re^3: discussion: What should split( /PATTERN/, EXPR, 0 ) return better? (LIMIT is consistent! )
in thread discussion: What should split( /PATTERN/, EXPR, 0 ) return better?

So it's 33 and it's OK.
  • Comment on Re^4: discussion: What should split( /PATTERN/, EXPR, 0 ) return better? (LIMIT is consistent! )

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: discussion: What should split( /PATTERN/, EXPR, 0 ) return better? (LIMIT is consistent! )
by LanX (Saint) on Oct 13, 2017 at 14:26 UTC
    > it's OK.

    so you ignored tybalt89's answer to try warnings ...

      DB<31> use warnings; $sum =  10 + 11 + "12 13 14 15" ; --> Argument "12 13 14 15" isn't numeric in addition (+) at ...

    I'm very busy at the moment, please excuse if I don't reply to your threads anymore. :)

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
    Je suis Charlie!

      I can't name code broken if it throws warnings, broken to me means giving bad answers, crashing, etc.

      It's OK, you can write answers, many of them are useful and informative! Thank you.