Re^3: discussion: What should split( /PATTERN/, EXPR, 0 ) return better? (LIMIT is consistent! )

in reply to Re^2: discussion: What should split( /PATTERN/, EXPR, 0 ) return better? (LIMIT is consistent! )
in thread discussion: What should split( /PATTERN/, EXPR, 0 ) return better?

> , it is not broken, it is as I wanted

$sum = 10 + 11 + "12 13 14 15" ;

Did you see tybalt89's answer?

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)

Je suis Charlie!}

Comment on Re^3: discussion: What should split( /PATTERN/, EXPR, 0 ) return better? (LIMIT is consistent! ) Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: discussion: What should split( /PATTERN/, EXPR, 0 ) return better? (LIMIT is consistent! ) by rsFalse (Chaplain) on Oct 13, 2017 at 13:14 UTC
So it's 33 and it's OK.	[reply]
Re^5: discussion: What should split( /PATTERN/, EXPR, 0 ) return better? (LIMIT is consistent! ) by LanX (Saint) on Oct 13, 2017 at 14:26 UTC
> it's OK. so you ignored tybalt89's answer to try `warnings` ... `DB<31> use warnings; $sum = 10 + 11 + "12 13 14 15" ;` --> `Argument "12 13 14 15" isn't numeric in addition (+) at ...` I'm very busy at the moment, please excuse if I don't reply to your threads anymore. :) Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :) Je suis Charlie!}	[reply] [d/l]
Re^6: discussion: What should split( /PATTERN/, EXPR, 0 ) return better? (LIMIT is consistent! ) by rsFalse (Chaplain) on Oct 13, 2017 at 19:11 UTC
I can't name code broken if it throws warnings, broken to me means giving bad answers, crashing, etc. It's OK, you can write answers, many of them are useful and informative! Thank you.	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom