Re^2: discussion: What should split( /PATTERN/, EXPR, 0 ) return better? (LIMIT is consistent! )

So, if it returns unsplitted remaining, it is not broken, it is as I wanted, especially for doing arithmetic sum.

I didn't understand about "your desired count behavior for LIMIT=0 is actually mapped on LIMIT=1". My desired behaviour don't have an equivalent value of any possible LIMIT.

Comment on Re^2: discussion: What should split( /PATTERN/, EXPR, 0 ) return better? (LIMIT is consistent! )

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: discussion: What should split( /PATTERN/, EXPR, 0 ) return better? (LIMIT is consistent! ) by LanX (Saint) on Oct 13, 2017 at 13:06 UTC
> , it is not broken, it is as I wanted `$sum = 10 + 11 + "12 13 14 15" ;` Orly? Did you see tybalt89's answer? Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :) Je suis Charlie!}	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: discussion: What should split( /PATTERN/, EXPR, 0 ) return better? (LIMIT is consistent! ) by rsFalse (Chaplain) on Oct 13, 2017 at 13:14 UTC
So it's 33 and it's OK.	[reply]
Re^5: discussion: What should split( /PATTERN/, EXPR, 0 ) return better? (LIMIT is consistent! ) by LanX (Saint) on Oct 13, 2017 at 14:26 UTC
> it's OK. so you ignored tybalt89's answer to try `warnings` ... `DB<31> use warnings; $sum = 10 + 11 + "12 13 14 15" ;` --> `Argument "12 13 14 15" isn't numeric in addition (+) at ...` I'm very busy at the moment, please excuse if I don't reply to your threads anymore. :) Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :) Je suis Charlie!}	[reply] [d/l]
Re^6: discussion: What should split( /PATTERN/, EXPR, 0 ) return better? (LIMIT is consistent! ) by rsFalse (Chaplain) on Oct 13, 2017 at 19:11 UTC