Er, no.
- Post anonymously, signing it as yourself.
- Then log in as yourself, and reply to the anonymous post saying "Yes, I did that."
This way, there is verification that you are actually taking responsibility for your post.
That said, I don't suggest it. PM XP and PM levels are definitely a poor indicator of perl experience 1. They are more often indicators of one's contributions and involvement in the community. I definitely advise just posting and taking your lumps (anvils or sugar) as they come, and track your coding ability against real live code instead.
1 Take me for an example. Not a good coder, but (before i went dormant for a while) a contributor to the community, asker of decent questions (even if I am stubborn).
| [reply] |
Thanks for everyone's thoughts....
I do accept that XP is a very, very crude gauge. It is probably futile to attempt to refine it but I'm going to try anyway.
Since nobody tells me that a second account will consume lots of server resources or confuse people, I've created social_mandog.
Posting Anonymously just seems too cumbersome and prone to error. (What if somebody posts anonymously, claims to be me and I don't notice?)
Also a second account allows me to (crudely) track my social contributions.
| [reply] |
On second thought, I doubt if anyone would get away with that for too long.
email: mandog
| [reply] |
For what ever it means, this anonymous monk is is not me...
email: mandog
| [reply] |