Re: New meaning to SmokeTesters?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: New meaning to SmokeTesters? by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Dec 26, 2017 at 18:41 UTC
Is there any topic in the world which you do not get wrong? Vaping is much safer than mass produced cigarettes, it's helping smokers quit, and it's lowering adoption of smoking. There are scientific studies showing all three points. Footnote: I neither vape nor smoke (anything). And have also, like just about everyone in the world, lost family to cancer caused by smoking.	[reply]
Re^3: New meaning to SmokeTesters? by Anonymous Monk on Dec 31, 2017 at 11:30 UTC
Thats just spam/ads/propaganda vaping A 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) report found that the scientific evidence for the effectiveness of vaping for quitting smoking is "scant and of low certainty".	[reply]
Re^2: New meaning to SmokeTesters? by stonecolddevin (Parson) on Dec 27, 2017 at 20:16 UTC
Nicotine isn't what causes cancer in cigarettes. Vaping delivers the addictive part of the cigarette without the carcinogenics. I mean I double checked this in a 3 second google search. I kind of want to know what you think of 9/11 then. Three thousand years of beautiful tradition, from Moses to Sandy Koufax, you're god damn right I'm living in the fucking past	[reply]
Re^3: New meaning to SmokeTesters? by Anonymous Monk on Dec 30, 2017 at 02:17 UTC
Nicotine isn't what causes cancer in cigarettes. Vaping delivers the addictive part of the cigarette without the carcinogenics. I mean I double checked this in a 3 second google search. I kind of want to know what you think of 9/11 then. As much as I am not a fan of that user How the hell can you argue the tobacco industry is honest in disclosing health risks for your lungs? two quotes Among flavoring compounds emitted in some e-cigarette aerosols are 2,3-pentanedione and diacetyl, which NIOSH has linked to causing obliterative bronchiolitis, a devastating lung disease in workers Further research is needed on the health risks of e-cigarettes, but available evidence suggests harmful effects.	[reply]
Re^4: New meaning to SmokeTesters? by stonecolddevin (Parson) on Dec 30, 2017 at 17:56 UTC
I never argued that the tobacco industry did anything. I also never said e-cigs were completely without health detriments. Three thousand years of beautiful tradition, from Moses to Sandy Koufax, you're god damn right I'm living in the fucking past	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re^2: New meaning to SmokeTesters? by Anonymous Monk on Dec 27, 2017 at 09:39 UTC
1206216: Please keep this in mind as we all strive to reduce the noise-pollution on this site. then Sorry for being off-topic ... and I don’t really mean for this topic-fork to continue. It’s just that ... some wounds will never heal. You just confirmed what everyone just said about you	[reply]