Re^2: New meaning to SmokeTesters?

Nicotine isn't what causes cancer in cigarettes. Vaping delivers the addictive part of the cigarette without the carcinogenics. I mean I double checked this in a 3 second google search. I kind of want to know what you think of 9/11 then.

Three thousand years of beautiful tradition, from Moses to Sandy Koufax, you're god damn right I'm living in the fucking past

Comment on Re^2: New meaning to SmokeTesters?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: New meaning to SmokeTesters? by Anonymous Monk on Dec 30, 2017 at 02:17 UTC
Nicotine isn't what causes cancer in cigarettes. Vaping delivers the addictive part of the cigarette without the carcinogenics. I mean I double checked this in a 3 second google search. I kind of want to know what you think of 9/11 then. As much as I am not a fan of that user How the hell can you argue the tobacco industry is honest in disclosing health risks for your lungs? two quotes Among flavoring compounds emitted in some e-cigarette aerosols are 2,3-pentanedione and diacetyl, which NIOSH has linked to causing obliterative bronchiolitis, a devastating lung disease in workers Further research is needed on the health risks of e-cigarettes, but available evidence suggests harmful effects.	[reply]
Re^4: New meaning to SmokeTesters? by stonecolddevin (Parson) on Dec 30, 2017 at 17:56 UTC
I never argued that the tobacco industry did anything. I also never said e-cigs were completely without health detriments. Three thousand years of beautiful tradition, from Moses to Sandy Koufax, you're god damn right I'm living in the fucking past	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.