Re^5: Migrating from Windows Server 2003

You mean it , is GD 2.68, it seems can be built on most of stable version on windows, but if you choose 2.60, 2.58,etc (below the matrix page) you will see the difference.

I am trying to improve my English skills, if you see a mistake please feel free to reply or /msg me a correction

Comment on Re^5: Migrating from Windows Server 2003

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Migrating from Windows Server 2003 by marto (Cardinal) on Jul 20, 2018 at 13:26 UTC
"You mean it" Yes, I specifically linked to the current release. "but if you choose 2.60, 2.58,etc (below the matrix page) you will see the difference." There are zero Windows failures for v2.60, v2.59 has zero failures. v2.58 has no Windows tests at all (likely because 2.57, 2.58, 2.59 and 2.60 were released in rapid succession on the same day). 2.57 has zero failures. The Changes shows significant improvements between releases. Why would you want to recommend an older version? Each non passing test in the matrix needs to be read to find out if the test failure is down to the module, (update: added:) the tests or an issue with the system running the tests.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^6: Migrating from Windows Server 2003
by marto (Cardinal) on Jul 20, 2018 at 13:26 UTC

"You mean it"

Yes, I specifically linked to the current release.

"but if you choose 2.60, 2.58,etc (below the matrix page) you will see the difference."

There are zero Windows failures for v2.60, v2.59 has zero failures. v2.58 has no Windows tests at all (likely because 2.57, 2.58, 2.59 and 2.60 were released in rapid succession on the same day). 2.57 has zero failures. The Changes shows significant improvements between releases. Why would you want to recommend an older version? Each non passing test in the matrix needs to be read to find out if the test failure is down to the module, (update: added:) the tests or an issue with the system running the tests.

[reply]