in reply to Re^6: open undef
in thread open undef

Yes, it's a known bug.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^8: open undef
by morgon (Priest) on Aug 02, 2018 at 20:57 UTC
    So do you know if it will be fixed?

    It bit me today when I was consolidating several stand-alone scripts into one script when I forgot to change one occurence of $ARGV[0] and did not get the error I expected.

    Would reporting it again speed up anything?

      It might have been more precise to say "known limitation". I don't know if it's considered a bug. After all, undef was passed.