in reply to Re^7: open undef
in thread open undef

So do you know if it will be fixed?

It bit me today when I was consolidating several stand-alone scripts into one script when I forgot to change one occurence of $ARGV[0] and did not get the error I expected.

Would reporting it again speed up anything?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^9: open undef
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Aug 05, 2018 at 05:16 UTC

    It might have been more precise to say "known limitation". I don't know if it's considered a bug. After all, undef was passed.