in reply to Re^2: Licensing clarification: Requiring a BSD licensed dist in a Perl licensed dist
in thread Licensing clarification: Requiring a BSD licensed dist in a Perl licensed dist

If I had to guess, it looks like this could be the original code. The license is the 3-clause BSD license, without the advertising clause, so AFAICT it should be GPL compatible. But you might also want to try and get confirmation from iliapenev about what the original code was (maybe open an issue).

  • Comment on Re^3: Licensing clarification: Requiring a BSD licensed dist in a Perl licensed dist

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Licensing clarification: Requiring a BSD licensed dist in a Perl licensed dist
by stevieb (Canon) on Oct 25, 2018 at 20:50 UTC

    Thanks again haukex,

    After I sent the email, I've moved on. I've dealt with them for a few years now (not on legal licensing issues mind you), so I'm confident that they'll do the leg-work here and get me authoritative answers.

    Doesn't hurt to make them aware that some of their products are accessible via Perl either I don't think.

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom