in reply to RE: Obfuscated? no.... ;-)
in thread Obfuscated? no.... ;-)
I thought it funny that a ( suposed :-) comment is used in the code...
I could have said this though... if you like... is it good enough for you?
%_=(Just=>q=%20==>another=>q=%20==>Perl=>q=%20==>Hacker=>q=%0A==>)=>
print map{$_->[2]=~s=[^->]?(.[^->])=chr(hex($1))=e;$_->[0]=>$_->[2]}
sort{$b->[1]cmp$a->[1]}map{[$_=>m=[^->]+([aeiou])==>$_{$_}]}keys %_;
Did I mention that I always do my 'one liners' under strict and -w
I belive that good practices should go through every code you write... but that's another thread.
-- Casey
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
RE: RE: RE: Obfuscated? no.... ;-)
by mcwee (Pilgrim) on Jun 02, 2000 at 22:35 UTC | |
|
RE: RE: RE: Obfuscated? no.... ;-)
by mcwee (Pilgrim) on Jun 02, 2000 at 22:36 UTC | |
|
RE: RE: RE: Obfuscated? no.... ;-)
by KM (Priest) on Jun 02, 2000 at 22:45 UTC |