Im curious but why do you suggest P::RD? It isnt a FSA in the slightest. In fact it isnt a LR parser at all. (Which are usually implemented as FSM's).
UPDATE:
While downvoting is certainly a monks right, id like to register the fact that I see no reason at all for downvoting cine's nodes in this thread. Yeah he was bit abrubt but if you read the advice for downvoting I can see no good reason there why these nodes should be --'d. Downvoting should be reserved for trolls and absolute garbage posts. These nodes while hardly exemplary are neither.
/rant off
Yves / DeMerphq
---
Writing a good benchmark isnt as easy as it might look. | [reply] |
Because I thought she/he is going to use it to parse something and knows about FSA/LR parsers from the standard literature and therefore searched for that.
T
I
M
T
O
W
T
D
I
| [reply] |
actualy, i am trying to swig/perl5 openfst 1.8.1-rc1, and have difficulties to find a good root class for it!
cpython gives ''pywrapfst'', what could we use ?!
is it an algorithm, a converter, a parser, a data bayes, an AI , or a finite state transducer, etc... ?
anyway, any work in progress to share is welcomed...thx.
| [reply] |
| [reply] |