in reply to Perl & SOAP vs. ASP.net

First, Perl under ASP or CGI can access COM objects just fine and is a perfectly acceptable way to put a web front-end on them. If you don't want to use PerlScript in ASP pages, you could try out PerlEx from ActiveState.

Second, Microsoft swears up and down that any idiot can turn their COM objects into web services, so your IS team should be able to do it easilly. Their concerns about performance may be valid though if this application requires very fast response times, since SOAP is not very fast (generate XML, send it over HTTP, parse the XML, generate more, send it back over HTTP, parse again).

But the silliest part of this is that they want you, who volunteered that you "don't know much about object oriented programming and nothing about the .net systems" to learn a new strongly-typed OO language, not to mention the COM model, just so you can put a web interface on their stuff. If they insist on staying with an all-Microsoft stack of products, ASP with VBScript would be a more obvious choice.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Perl & SOAP vs. ASP.net
by crenz (Priest) on Aug 03, 2002 at 05:36 UTC

    But the silliest part of this is that they want you...

    Yes, I agree. People don't take into consideration that "speed" not only refers to execution speed, but also to implementation speed.

    But the main problem is: Decisions like these are often based on management directives and gut feelings, rather than facts. I fear that even if you have the better arguments, it will be hard to turn the tide. It is amazing how perfectly willing a company can be to waste their employee's time.

    To improve your working conditions, maybe you can get your boss to read The Hacker FAQ. ;-)