in reply to performance of huge array looping
If however you are looking for a real performance boost, look into an algorithm that doesn't require the entire array to exist at one time. The fact you don't need an element anymore after you process it suggests you may not need all the elements before processing the first one either.
Abigail
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Re: performance of huge array looping
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 14, 2002 at 14:13 UTC | |
by belden (Friar) on Aug 14, 2002 at 17:48 UTC | |
by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Aug 14, 2002 at 15:01 UTC |