anti-obfuscation

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
(zdog) RE: anti-obfuscation by zdog (Priest) on Jun 30, 2000 at 02:06 UTC
It is my opinion that this post is a waste of a node, however, if you are really anti-obfuscation, you should have done: `print "Just another Perl Hacker \n"; # he he...` [download] Now, it proves your point better and it doesn't return a syntax error. Haw haw... Zenon Zabinski \| zdog \| zdog7@hotmail.com	[reply] [d/l]
RE: anti-obfuscation by frankus (Priest) on Jul 07, 2000 at 16:43 UTC
In my book if it can be parsed by a two line regex, however cheesy, it ain't obfuscated. This should clarify: s/(\" and print \"\|\+\|he .{2}\|\n\|\r\|\.+]//g; s/ \";/\.\n\"/; My advice is use perl -de 0 to clarify the code works and then paste it in from there. Frankus.	[reply]