in reply to RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage
in thread Deep Linkage

Oh, I dunno... seems awfully excessive to me.
  • Comment on Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage
by Anonymous Monk on Jan 06, 2003 at 22:23 UTC

    Not at all, in fact during the pre-XP/Post ratio era there were many threads that extended beyond this. Around the turn of the 14th century this all changed and threads began to take on a longer single post format as opposed to the multiple terser post format of the previous era.

    I believe there is even a group that reenacts these old time discussions, though I can't find the link right now ;).

      But what is the record number of 'RE:'s for a post with some actual content?
        You are reading it now (for certain definitions of the word content).

        (I'm not really here anyway)