in reply to Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage
in thread Deep Linkage

Not at all, in fact during the pre-XP/Post ratio era there were many threads that extended beyond this. Around the turn of the 14th century this all changed and threads began to take on a longer single post format as opposed to the multiple terser post format of the previous era.

I believe there is even a group that reenacts these old time discussions, though I can't find the link right now ;).

  • Comment on Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage
by runrig (Abbot) on Jan 07, 2003 at 04:25 UTC
    But what is the record number of 'RE:'s for a post with some actual content?
      You are reading it now (for certain definitions of the word content).

      (I'm not really here anyway)

        True...