in reply to Re: Re: Perl 6 Involvement
in thread Perl 6 Involvement

Ok, I just fixed it in CVS. Robert should wave the magic wand to get the changes over to the web site soon. Sorry, Piers -- I just updated that page recently, but I didn't read it first or I would have noticed.

So it does update itself -- you just have to make a wish in some obscure forum, and voila!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re^3: Perl 6 Involvement
by theorbtwo (Prior) on Jan 23, 2003 at 21:16 UTC

    Obscure? I should -- you for that! (But instead, because I'm not a wacko (OK, I am, but not a fanatic) I'll ++ you for performing a service to the community.)

    Warning: Unless otherwise stated, code is untested. Do not use without understanding. Code is posted in the hopes it is useful, but without warranty. All copyrights are relinquished into the public domain unless otherwise stated. I am not an angel. I am capable of error, and err on a fairly regular basis. If I made a mistake, please let me know (such as by replying to this node).

[reply]
      Would you prefer obscure or "well-known forum full of loons"? :-P
[reply]
        Now, now, let's not go downvoting in a snit. (It should be saved for moments of sheer towering righteous indignation) Like it or not, the monastery does have a rep that ranges from bad to abysmal in some segments of the perl community.
[reply]

        I'll take "well-known forum full of loons" for 1000, Dan.

        Warning: Unless otherwise stated, code is untested. Do not use without understanding. Code is posted in the hopes it is useful, but without warranty. All copyrights are relinquished into the public domain unless otherwise stated. I am not an angel. I am capable of error, and err on a fairly regular basis. If I made a mistake, please let me know (such as by replying to this node).

[reply]

In Section Meditations