in reply to Re^3: Perl 6 Involvement
in thread Perl 6 Involvement

Obscure? I should -- you for that! (But instead, because I'm not a wacko (OK, I am, but not a fanatic) I'll ++ you for performing a service to the community.)

Warning: Unless otherwise stated, code is untested. Do not use without understanding. Code is posted in the hopes it is useful, but without warranty. All copyrights are relinquished into the public domain unless otherwise stated. I am not an angel. I am capable of error, and err on a fairly regular basis. If I made a mistake, please let me know (such as by replying to this node).

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re^3: Perl 6 Involvement
by Elian (Parson) on Jan 23, 2003 at 21:51 UTC
    Would you prefer obscure or "well-known forum full of loons"? :-P
[reply]
      Now, now, let's not go downvoting in a snit. (It should be saved for moments of sheer towering righteous indignation) Like it or not, the monastery does have a rep that ranges from bad to abysmal in some segments of the perl community.
[reply]
        Like it or not, the monastery does have a rep that ranges from bad to abysmal in some segments of the perl community.

        Yeah, good thing it has anonymous posting so we can still ask elementary questions and troll here 8-)

[reply]

      I'll take "well-known forum full of loons" for 1000, Dan.

      Warning: Unless otherwise stated, code is untested. Do not use without understanding. Code is posted in the hopes it is useful, but without warranty. All copyrights are relinquished into the public domain unless otherwise stated. I am not an angel. I am capable of error, and err on a fairly regular basis. If I made a mistake, please let me know (such as by replying to this node).

[reply]
        And the answer is "A place full of star wars actress and hot southern ethnic food fetishists"
[reply]

In Section Meditations