in reply to combining html and on-the-fly images using Image::Magick

To clarify jeffa's response, you can't do what you want to do. Images in html are just links that the browser automatically downloads. There is a separate connection for every image. So what you are doing is more or less right.

____________________
Jeremy
I didn't believe in evil until I dated it.

  • Comment on Re: combining html and on-the-fly images using Image::Magick

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: combining html and on-the-fly images using Image::Magick
by revdiablo (Prior) on May 25, 2003 at 05:03 UTC
[reply]
      That is indeed a cool trick, and is much needed, but I can't see any specs for it at w3c.org, which makes me think it is browser specific and therefore A Bad Thing, regardless of how cool it is.

      (Standards are everything. Obey the w3c. The w3c is your friend.)

      Update: the w3c has nothing to say on the matter, but the IETF does (as mentioned below in this thread). So yay to that. ____________________
      Jeremy
      I didn't believe in evil until I dated it.

[reply]
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom