Re: Re: combining html and on-the-fly images using Image::Magick

This is not entirely true. It is possible to literally embed an image into the source of a page in HTML. Check out Re: Incorporating On-The-Fly Graphics In CGI output for details.

Comment on Re: Re: combining html and on-the-fly images using Image::Magick

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: combining html and on-the-fly images using Image::Magick by jepri (Parson) on May 25, 2003 at 05:20 UTC
That is indeed a cool trick, and is much needed, but I can't see any specs for it at w3c.org, which makes me think it is browser specific and therefore A Bad Thing, regardless of how cool it is. (Standards are everything. Obey the w3c. The w3c is your friend.) Update: the w3c has nothing to say on the matter, but the IETF does (as mentioned below in this thread). So yay to that. ____________________ Jeremy I didn't believe in evil until I dated it.	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: Re: combining html and on-the-fly images using Image::Magick by revdiablo (Prior) on May 25, 2003 at 05:43 UTC
See RFC2397.	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: combining html and on-the-fly images using Image::Magick by jepri (Parson) on May 25, 2003 at 07:56 UTC
OK, you win and I am an enthusiastic supporter. Although that tag length limit is a bummer. ____________________ Jeremy I didn't believe in evil until I dated it.	[reply]