hehe, pretty cool , a sig that generates 3 warnings, lol..
maybe i should try running them with -wT *and* use strict turned on in the future when i'm cocky enough to leave out the shebang ;)
howell, back to the drawingboard it is, .. felt it was a bit bloated anyways

the first 2 errors i cant explain yet but the last is the redifinement of
 *p=sub{print@_};
to
*p=sub{map{print" ".(lc ($_))}@_};
on the fourth line
which didn't really felt right at the time but it was late :)
ahum, nor was i running -w
thnx!