Re: Re: reading EXIF tags in JPEG files ?

Interesting that "EXIF" doesn't find anything on Super Search (only some false hits), not even this very thread (which doesn't worry me since it may not be indexed yet or something). But it led me to beleive that EXIF had never been uttered in the Monistary before now.

Comment on Re: Re: reading EXIF tags in JPEG files ?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
3Re: reading EXIF tags in JPEG files ? by jeffa (Bishop) on Aug 09, 2003 at 13:53 UTC
Super Search does indeed pick up this thread as well as JPEG EXIF headers and Perl ... but not on the first page of results. If you click the "Next >" button one or two times, you will find them on the second or third page of results. Super search is set up to only search so much of the database at a time - it starts (unfortunately) at the beginning, and works it's way to the present. Now, if you had searched for titles that contain "EXIF", you will find this thread and the other on the first page of results. Just trying to keep the record straight ... ;) jeffa L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L-- -R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B-- H---H---H---H---H---H--- (the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: reading EXIF tags in JPEG files ? by RMGir (Prior) on Aug 08, 2003 at 15:46 UTC
s/Super //; :) Plain un-super Search for EXIF worked fine. It's odd what gets picked up by Super Search, what gets found by Search, and when Google is the answer. -- Mike	[reply]