Liz

Thanks for the reference. His notes indicate that the spec is now available, which is a big improvement from the last time I looked when the only thing available on the web was some weak reverse-engineering notes.

FWIW, I downloaded Image::Info and it failed t\exif. Funny, since that's what I needed it for.

It's a wrapper around this package.

- Matt Riffle

Things to check out:

• A thread on the subject 279671
• Image::EXIF
• Image::Info
• Image::Magick

Peter @ Berghold . Net

Sieze the cow! Bite the day!

Test the code? We don't need to test no stinkin' code! All code posted here is as is where is unless otherwise stated.

Brewer of Belgian style Ales

havoc asked a very similar question last week, and the posts in that thread might be helpful.
--
Mike

Interesting that "EXIF" doesn't find anything on Super Search (only some false hits), not even this very thread (which doesn't worry me since it may not be indexed yet or something). But it led me to beleive that EXIF had never been uttered in the Monistary before now.

Super Search does indeed pick up this thread as well as JPEG EXIF headers and Perl ... but not on the first page of results. If you click the "Next >" button one or two times, you will find them on the second or third page of results. Super search is set up to only search so much of the database at a time - it starts (unfortunately) at the beginning, and works it's way to the present. Now, if you had searched for titles that contain "EXIF", you will find this thread and the other on the first page of results.

Just trying to keep the record straight ... ;)

jeffa

L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L--
-R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR
B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B--
H---H---H---H---H---H---
(the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)

s/Super //; :)

Plain un-super Search for EXIF worked fine.

It's odd what gets picked up by Super Search, what gets found by Search, and when Google is the answer.
--
Mike