# or
print "@{[@+]}\n";
# or
print join($"||"",@+),"\n";
:-)
---
demerphq
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
-- Gandhi
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |
Sure, you could use one of those. But, why would you?
Would it improve efficiency? Uh uh. Clarity? Certainly not.
I can't think of a good reason... can you?
BTW, I didn't realize this was a "bug" fixed in 5.8. I was thinking that perl didn't like to interpolate any variables that didn't start with a \w character. But, putting the name in braces will work with other (admittedly poor choices for) variable names such as @% and @!, not just ones perl knows.
-sauoq
"My two cents aren't worth a dime.";
| [reply] |
Sure, you could use one of those. But, why would you?
Actually I'd rate the second one ( without the $" || "" ) as the preferred way to go. I don't tend to like interpolating arrays in anything other than quick and dirty code. If I'm going to output a list I prefer a more distinct end of field character than a space.
But I _did_ put a smiley face on my node dude... :-)
---
demerphq
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
-- Gandhi
| [reply] [d/l] |