Why? Less written code == faster => no; some regexp solution is 'cooler' == you say; posting to PM for a 5 line answer in almost any lang is efficient......
cheers
tachyon
s&&rsenoyhcatreve&&&s&n.+t&"$'$`$\"$\&"&ee&&y&srve&&d&&print
| [reply] |
No I think you get me wrong, my reply wasn't meant to sound flippant.
I never said less written code == faster, neither did I suggest that using regex was more cool - that's some odd bias of yours I'm afraid.
Less written code can == easier to read, and easier to read may == easier to maintain. That seems as valid a reason as any, though an equally valid point might be regex != readable - there's no simple answer.
I would like to learn as much as possible about about perl, and I thought there should be a regex solution that would give a more compact solution - I attempted a solution which didn't quite work, and some of the replies have given me a greater insight into regex.
I did say thanks for the reply, and the question did have "regex" in the title, so you'll have to forgive me if I can't understand why you're so pissed off - don't worry I won't follow up on this thread and waste any more time.
Thanks to everyone, including yourself, for the useful answers you've all given.
| [reply] |
Then why watse our time? Why not go: "this does what I want but..." for some inexplicable reason I need TIMTOWDI. Despite the fact that what I have what I need, with no speed justification/benchmark at all, I would like you all to solve a problem I have already solved, for no particular reason, for free, for someone you dont know......
I am surprised there is less enthusiasm.
- Solving problems is one thing
- Solving solved problems is antoher thing
- Solving problems for someone who then goes on to go..... might possible erode the milk of HK. JM2c.
cheers
tachyon
s&&rsenoyhcatreve&&&s&n.+t&"$'$`$\"$\&"&ee&&y&srve&&d&&print
| [reply] |