in reply to Re: Re: Erm? Bug or not? Weird behaviour in hash / list conversion
in thread Erm? Bug or not? Weird behaviour in hash / list conversion

Your tied hash example still displays broken-ness: 
perl -e "%h = (1,1,1,1); print %h"

[download]
gives 
11

[download]
not the 
1111

[download]
displayed in your tied hash example.

rdfield

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Erm? Bug or not? Weird behaviour in hash / list conversion
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Oct 29, 2003 at 21:12 UTC

    Your absolutely right++. Whilst tieing the hash 'fixes' the undefined values problem, it still results in the wrong output.

    Seems pretty clear that there are two bugs that are interacting to produce the bizarre results in the original problem. Tieing the hash bapasses one of them, but the second is still there. Well spotted.

    Examine what is said, not who speaks.
    "Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
    "Think for yourself!" - Abigail
    Hooray!
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom