in reply to Re: Re: The world is not object oriented
in thread The world is not object oriented
If this was a philosophy forum rather than a programming one, I might pursue this thread further.
No, this isn't a philosophy forum: But then, philosophical reasoning belongs in every forum :). At any rate, I thought the passage quoted was interesting and relevant, and that a great number of the objects we programmers use, or discover, or invent, are propped up entirely by groups of relations (conventions, if you will): The very concepts Object and Class in OO for example. And in a deeply OO language, Classes are Objects too. And when programmers get caught up in the "programming objects" == "real world objects" (and variations along those lines), it can be pertinent to ask them what "real world object" the Class object models.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: The world is not object oriented
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 04, 2004 at 02:19 UTC | |
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Jan 05, 2004 at 11:19 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 05, 2004 at 11:34 UTC | |
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Jan 05, 2004 at 11:53 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 05, 2004 at 12:26 UTC | |
|