But so are most of the active Perlmonks and as one Monk's consideration alone cannot do much, you get automatically an "average" opinion on these issues, which --I assume-- will be very much in line with what the gods think.
Consideration sets the tone, its the most important part of the process
See Re: Small Perl quests for a beginner? Considered: jdporter: reap. spam.
and see what tye says on consideration Re^3: swissprot assignment (worth), Re^5: swissprot assignment (effort), Re^7: swissprot assignment (effort)
Even monks tend to assume that those who consider nodes have done their due dilligence
Consider Reaped: Re^5: Should I list core modules as dependencies? and what LanX says about it in Re: using the power of consideration responsibly (what is personal attack what is trolling, can you lose power to consider) , his bias clouds his judgment
In reply to Re^6: using the power of consideration responsibly (what is personal attack what is trolling, can you lose power to consider)
by Anonymous Monk
in thread using the power of consideration responsibly (what is personal attack what is trolling, can you lose power to consider)
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |